Recently I spent most of the day at a Ladies Conference at my church. I will admit that I have never really enjoyed these kind of conferences, for several reasons. First of all, I am not big on large crowds of people and these conferences can sometimes pull in large numbers. I am much more a one on one or small group kind of person. I tend to have a few very close friends that I can count on rather than a slew of fair weather acquaintances. It is just my personality to prefer it that way. A second reason is that these conferences are usually geared towards subjects that specifically apply to ladies, most of which tend to not be the most stimulating from an intellectual scholarly point of view. While I have no objection to these subjects per se, I am and have always been a scholar and prefer a scholarly presentation on some deep spiritual or theological subject rather than hearing for the umpteenth time "How to be a Woman of God,"with lots of personal stories, visual props, crafts, and entertainment. It seems that this is the recurring theme at every conference. It only varies in the presentation. To me there is very little difference between being a woman of God and just being a Christian who does their best to walk in holiness, and I long ago learned what the requirements of doing that were. It is now my responsibility to work on that knowledge, not to have it drummed into me at every opportunity, as if I am unaware of the requirement. If I haven't learned it in the 60 years I have been a Christian, then obviously I am not going to learn it. That's not saying that other younger Christians don't need this lesson, but it would be nice if once in a while they geared the messages toward those who are mature Christians who learned all this long ago. The last problem for me is that these things often tend to deteriorate to an elementary school level entertainment production, as horrible as that may sound.
To demonstrate what I mean with that last remark, let me share what I experienced at my latest conference. As most of these things begin, we started with prayer and singing a hymn. So far so good. The speaker gave us handouts on the topic, which was Jeremiah 18. She was going to discuss the potter and the clay and all the lessons that can be learned from that comparison as to God's relationship with us and how God molds us. This is not the deepest spiritual lesson one can learn, as it is a rather basic lesson that one should learn as a new Christian. I call it a lesson from Christianity 101. She went over the basics of receiving salvation, and then our need for ongoing repentance and allowing God to bring into our lives what He does for our spiritual growth. It is most definitely one that should be taught to new Christians, and as this woman is actually what I would call an evangelist by spiritual gifting, I would expect that this would be the basic lesson that she teaches, no matter what Scriptures she might use to vary the presentation.
As she also seems to do these presentations with young people or children much of the time (being a pastor's wife), she has developed a method which she uses regardless of the nature of the audience. So, even though probably 85% of the audience constituted people over the age of 55 in this case, we were treated to what would have been a very entertaining show for elementary and possibly as old as high school children. She put on the costumes of characters such as an old woman, and a haughty British schoolteacher (I understand she has other characters she uses from well-known children's books as well) and in those personas presented us with some elementary school science tricks. With each trick there was a spiritual application. e.g. colored water made clear by the application of some chemical shows us that Jesus washes us clean of our sins. A bar of Ivory soap in a microwave (do not try this) will greatly expand, because Ivory is the only soap that has water in it. The application being that when we are indwelt with the Living Water of Jesus, we expand with His love and grace. There were a number of such science experiments. We also did a craft. We painted one of our hands with white paint and made a hand print on a black piece of construction paper, then put a red dot in the middle of the palm to make it look like Jesus' nail pierced hand, then wrote something underneath it such as "Paid in Full." I remember my children doing much the same type of craft in Vacation Bible School.
Now, there is nothing wrong with any of this, and I am not criticizing using these things in the proper venue. What my point in all this is, this is neither physically or spiritually age appropriate for women who are basically senior citizens, who for the most part claim a Christian walk with the Lord of decades in length. This should have been nursery school stuff for them. In other words like baby's milk. It was New Christianity 101, not Mature Christianity 501. It would have been excellent as a Vacation Bible School presentation for children. It was not what women of this age and supposed spiritual maturity should have been satisfied with as a spiritual learning experience, yet that is exactly how they responded. They were thrilled with the day and felt it was a such a wonderful spiritually enlightening experience. As awful as this may sound for me to say this, it should not have been. They should have walked away feeling a hungry for spiritual food instead of full. What was taught should not have filled a person who was spiritually mature and looking to learn something that would push their learning curve even further. They settled for milk. And unfortunately they settle for it week after week in church as well.
What disturbed me was not that this wonderful lady presented this, for this is her thing, but that this is all that these women expect or want in the way of learning. They were all impressed, and uplifted by it all, none of them seeming to see that it was way below what they should have been embracing in the way of spiritual education. By now, they should have long ago moved on from this kind of milk. We are told in Hebrews 5:12-14, 6:1-2 " For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one
teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and
are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat. For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe.
But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who
by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and
evil. Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on
unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from
dead works, and of faith toward God, Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment." And in 1 Corinthians 3:2 "And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able."
Continuing to teach Christians who are no longer classified as "new" Christians the same doctrines over and over of salvation, repentance, faith, baptism, the reality of a resurrection, and eternal judgment is not growing in the Lord. For some reason, pastors seem to think that these are the subjects that they should be teaching over and over and over instead of moving on to other things. These are the milk of our belief. These are the basic tenets which we should be taught at first, but then we should move on to other things. Scholarly things. When the Scriptures above were written, the New Testament was not formed. The epistles were merely letters that circulated among the churches. The gospel message was the milk. The meat of Scripture was the Scriptures which the people called the Talmud, or as we know it, the Old Testament. In other words, the Old Testament is the meat of Scripture. It is what, as mature Christians, we should be studying. The irony of this is that for the most part, a great many if not most of the clergy out there feel that the Old Testament is irrelevant and need not even be studied. As a side note, likewise they ignore the last book of the Bible, Revelation, as they also feel it is irrelevant to the Church as, at least in America, the Church does not think anything in that book applies to them. This despite the fact that God put a blessing on the book for those who read and heed it, so that they would be encouraged to study it.
While so many think the Old Testament has nothing to offer, God tells us "All
scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for
doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished
unto all good works." 2 Timothy 3:16-17. God considers the information in the Old Testament to be information which will 1) teach you correct doctrine, 2) offer reproof when needed, 3) correct your errors of behavior and understanding, 4) instruct you in righteous living 5) furnish you to be able to do the works God calls you to do, and as Hebrews tells us, also teaches us 6) how to learn to be discerning of good and evil, 7) to be skillful in handling the Word, rightly dividing it, 8) to be strong in righteousness, 9) to be a mature Christian, and 10) to turn you into a teacher of the Word rather than a babe, all which 11) perfects your faith which 12) teaches you how to know God better.
Not only will studying the Old Testament do these things for you, the New Testament cannot be fully understood or rightly divided unless one studies the Old Testament, for many things in the New Testament refer back or reference things from the Old. We are told in 2 Timothy 2:15 " Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." One has to study all of a subject to rightly divide it, and if you are leaving out the bulk of the information, how can one possibly divide it correctly? This is especially true of prophecy. Most of the end times prophecies are in the Old Testament. The book of Revelation cannot truly be understood without a massive amount of help from the Old. Not only the prophets, but even the Torah or Pentateuch as Gentiles tend to refer to it. These are Laws of God and Moses. The information contained in these five book, as well as the prophets, plays a large part in understanding Revelation. And prophecy is for the mature in Christ, not the babe.
In all the years I have attended church, and the many churches I have attended, including a number of different denominations, I find that with rare exceptions, the sermons always speak in some form or other of the milk of the Bible. In fact, it is to the point of boredom. How many times can one go to kindergarten and get anything out of it? Once you learn 2 + 2 = 4, you need to move on to algebra and then geometry, and then trigonometry, and calculus, etc. You cannot just find a variety of ways to teach 2 + 2 = 4 and expect anyone to learn any more about math. Neither can you constantly teach salvation and repentance over and over, no matter how many stories, or ways, or Scriptures you vary to teach it and think that your congregation is going to grow in knowledge. God has a very serious warning about not growing in knowledge of Him and His Word. Hosea 4:6 "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast
rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no
priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also
forget thy children."
The story of salvation and the First Coming is what we are told to take out into the unbelieving world, so that they might be saved. But once saved, we are to move on and quit looking back at the First Coming and look towards the Second Coming, which should be the primary concern of the saved individual for his own learning and growth. The First Coming is for unbelievers. The Second Coming is for believers, and we should put our attention on that subject matter and learn all there is to learn about it. That is exactly why God put a blessing on the last book of the Bible. But without the foundation of a solid knowledge of the entire Old Testament, you will miss a great deal of what that final book contains. That is why so many people find the book so extremely hard to understand. Of course it is under those conditions. If you have only learned 2 + 2 = 4, you cannot do calculus, can you. The reason God put it at the end is because He expected people to read the Bible from the beginning to the end, but if interested in the end at all, people skip through the book and read only the last chapter, as it were, to find out the ending. The problem is, without understanding what is going on, the ending will make no sense.
God tells us that in the last days, there will be a falling away from truth, or what we call apostasy. 2 Thessalonians 2:3 "Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except
there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the
son of perdition;" He asks if He will even find faith when He returns. Luke 18:8b "Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?" He tells us that people will not want to hear the truth of His Word, because they have itching ears that they want to tickle. 2 Timothy 4:3-4 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but
after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having
itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." This is exactly why the Church is in such apostasy. They do not study God's Word and therefore they do not grow, and they are unable to discern false teachings, because they cannot rightly divide God's truth.
The clergy for generations has been guilty of not teaching the people God's entire Word, and as a result, we now have a Church which does not even know what God's Word really says. Man has corrupted His teachings with all sorts of lies and perversions and nobody is the wiser. And the Church has watered things down to not just milk, but skim milk and that milk is sour. We treat mature adults as if they are kindergarteners, having them do finger paintings and watching elementary science tricks to teach them the basics of Christianity, which they should have learned the first year they were a Christian. What are we thinking? Not only do we do it, but if I have to judge from the response of the women at the conference I attended, we revel in it and think it is the utmost in spiritual heights. We should be attending the equivalent of college lectures, not vacation Bible school. How did we get so lazy? Why don't we even care?
My pastor made a comment in our Bible study that he has heard many pastors say that they are just too busy to spend time on sermons, so they throw them together on Saturday night. This explains a lot of why the teachings coming from the pulpit are milk. I know that most of them also get their sermons from reading commentaries rather than studying the Bible. And lastly I have heard that being so "busy," many pastors are now downloading pre-written sermons off the internet and giving them. Given that this is the state of a great amount of our clergy, does it not behoove us to get into the Scriptures ourselves to mature in God's Word, since you are most likely not going to get it at church? Technically aren't we commanded to do that anyway, so we can be Bereans? Pastors are not learning God's Word, and therefore they cannot rightly divide it and so are adopting all these New Age teachings, all these false doctrines, and allowing Satan into the sanctuary in a variety of ways, The people don't study the Scriptures, instead letting the pastors teach them what they think they need to know, and so they have no discernment and are led into apostasy. Then, because they have no maturity themselves, they let the church train up (or more accurately not train up) their children. Now instead of merely adopting the lifestyle of their parents with an immature Christian life as in past generations, they are leaving the churches in droves, because they don't have a vital growing relationship with Christ, and so the problem isn't just perpetuating itself from generation to generation anymore, it is deteriorating to the point of no return.
So in conclusion, while it might seem that I am being very harsh in my criticism of a ladies conference, it is a symptom of a much bigger problem. A problem which is killing the Church. If we don't start getting into the Word, again as God warned in Hosea, "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast
rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no
priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also
forget thy children." Not only will we be destroyed, and no longer be priests for Him, but He will forget our children. And the way our children are leaving the churches, this prophecy is coming true.
Sunday, February 18, 2018
Saturday, January 6, 2018
When Tradition is Held in Higher Esteem than God's Word
One of the main themes of the musical
Fiddler on the Roof is “tradition.” There is a song that
begins with those words, “Tradition, tradition! Tradition!” In
Judaism, tradition is paramount even over the Word of God. It was
this with which Jesus had a serious problem. The Pharisees and
scribes had over the years added their own traditions (supposedly
oral instructions from God that Moses never bothered writing down),
as well as pagan Babylonian Mystery traditions (learned during the
Babylonian captivity) to the Word of God. Instead of studying the
Tanakh or Old Testament, they chose to write down their own oral
traditions and commentaries and then each generation studied those
instead of strictly studying the Tanakh, as they felt one could not
understand the Scriptures without the insights and teachings of the
“great rabbis.” The Mishnah and the Talmud became more important
than the Torah (the first five books) or the Tanakh.
Jesus had this to say about their
traditions. [The following two passages relate the same event.]
Matthew 15:1-9 “Then came to Jesus
scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying, Why do thy
disciples transgress the tradition of the elders?
for they wash not their hands when they eat bread. But he answered
and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the
commandment of God by your tradition? For God commanded,
saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or
mother, let him die the death. But ye say, Whosoever shall say to
his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest
be profited by me; And honour not his father or his mother, he shall
be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none
effect by your tradition. Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias
prophesy of you, saying, This people draweth nigh unto me with their
mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from
me. But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the
commandments of men.”
Mark 7:5-13 “Then the Pharisees
and scribes asked him, Why walk not thy disciples according
to the tradition of the elders, but eat bread with
unwashen hands? He answered and said unto them, Well hath Esaias
prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoureth
me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. Howbeit
in vain do they worship me, teaching for
doctrines the commandments of men. For laying
aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men,
as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye
do. And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the
commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth
father or mother, let him die the death: But ye say, If a man shall
say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by
whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free. And ye
suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother; Making
the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have
delivered: and many such like things do ye.”
Notice that the Pharisees themselves
state that they expect Him (and everyone) to follow the traditions
of men. Jesus replies that they
are not only
rejecting, but also
transgressing the commandments
of God by holding to their traditions.
They are making God's commandments of no effect, or null and void by
their traditions, and even worse they teach their traditions to the
people as doctrine in
place of God's Word. Their traditions have superseded God's
commandments and laws. They have set themselves up as a higher moral
authority than God. Jesus also uses Scripture, or God's own words to
point out that God has said that their worship of Him is in vain,
since they are only teaching man's laws, not His.
In this particular passage, as an
example of their hypocritical heart condition, Christ relates their
tradition regarding the care of their parents, for the Pharisees had
by their traditions given themselves a loophole to taking care of
their parents, as God had commanded. They would “consecrate”
their goods to the temple as Corban which meant it was designated as
a gift for the treasury of the temple and thus could not go
elsewhere, but they arranged that they could hold onto it as long as
they wanted and give it when they wanted, for there was no prescribed
time limit to have to fulfill the vow. So essentially they could have
it done upon their death or if preferred, the gifting could expire
upon their death, making it null and void, so that it could become an
inheritance. This enabled them to keep their money, and nobody could
say anything to them about it, for there was (deliberately I assume)
nothing forcing them to take action upon their word. It was a phony
promise to the temple and a way of ignoring their parents' needs. It
is kind of like our politicians today. Plenty of promises, giving
themselves raises and nice retirements, etc. and keeping what they
owe the people they represent, from the people. History repeats
itself.
Jesus called the scribes and Pharisees
hypocrites over and over for their multitude of traditions and
man-made laws which they inflicted upon the people. Note the verse
above in Matthew 15:7-8 “Ye hypocrites,
well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying, This people draweth nigh
unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their
heart is far from me.” There are many more verses
where He is referring to them either directly or indirectly as
hypocrites.
Matthew 6:2 “Therefore when thou
doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the
hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that
they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their
reward.”
Matthew 6:5 “And when thou
prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites
are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the
corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say
unto you, They have their reward.”
Matthew 6:16 “Moreover when ye
fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad
countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear
unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.”
Matthew 16:1-3 “The
Pharisees also with the Sadducees came, and tempting
desired him that he would shew them a sign from heaven. He answered
and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair
weather: for the sky is red. And in the morning, It will be foul
weather to day: for the sky is red and lowring. O ye
hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye
not discern the signs of the times?”
Matthew 22:15-18 “Then went the
Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in
his talk.......But Jesus perceived their wickedness,
and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?”
Matthew 23:13-15 “But
woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!
for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go
in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a
pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the
greater damnation. Woe unto you,
scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye
compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye
make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.”
Matthew 23:23-29 “Woe
unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!
for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the
weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought
ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. Ye
blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and
of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.
Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is
within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean
also. Woe unto you, scribes and
Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward,
but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness.
Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye
are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. Woe unto
you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because
ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the
righteous,”
Matthew 24:51 “And shall cut him
asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites:
there shall be weeping and
gnashing of teeth.”
Luke
11:42-44 “But woe unto you, Pharisees!
for ye tithe mint and rue and all manner of herbs, and pass over
judgment and the love of God: these ought ye to have done, and not to
leave the other undone. Woe unto you, Pharisees! for
ye love the uppermost seats in the synagogues, and greetings in the
markets. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!
for ye are as graves which appear not, and the men that
walk over them are not aware of them.”
Matthew
16:3b-4 “O ye hypocrites, ye can
discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the
times? A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh
after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it,
but the sign of the prophet Jonas ”
Luke
12:56 “Ye hypocrites, ye can discern
the face of the sky and of the earth; but how is it that ye do not
discern this time?”
Luke 13:15 “The Lord then answered
him, and said, Thou hypocrite, doth not each one of you on the
sabbath loose his ox or his ass from the stall, and lead him away to
watering?”
Jesus had a few
other choice names for the Pharisees and scribes other than
hypocrites. He also calls them vipers, fools, and He says how they
are blind and an evil and adulterous generation and wicked within.
Matthew
3:7 “But when he saw many of the Pharisees and
Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O
generation of vipers, who hath warned you to
flee from the wrath to come?”
Matthew
12:34 “O generation of vipers, how
can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out
of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.”
Matthew
12:38-39 “Then certain of the scribes and of
the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see
a sign from thee. But he answered and said unto them, An
evil and adulterous generation seeketh
after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it,
but the sign of the prophet Jonas: ”
Matthew 23:16-17,19 “Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold?... Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift?”
Matthew
23:33 “Ye serpents, ye generation
of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of
hell?”
Luke
11:37-40 “And as he spake, a certain Pharisee besought
him to dine with him: and he went in, and sat down to meat. And when
the Pharisee saw it, he marvelled that he had not first washed before
dinner. And the Lord said unto him, Now do ye Pharisees make clean
the outside of the cup and the platter; but your inward
part is full of ravening and wickedness. Ye
fools, did not he that made that which is without make
that which is within also?”
John
9:40-41 “And some of the Pharisees which were with
him heard these words, and said unto him, Are we blind also?
Jesus said unto them, If ye were blind, ye should have no sin:
but now ye say, We see; therefore your sin remaineth.”
Lawyers also
tempted Him and came under condemnation, although many if not most of
the lawyers were also Pharisees. He accuses them of laying burdens
upon people that were too great for them to bear, while they
themselves did not practice what they preached. He also accused them
of taking away the key to God's knowledge and while not studying
themselves, they also prevented those who would study from studying.
Matthew
22:35-36 “Then one of
them, which was a lawyer,
asked him a question, tempting him,
and saying, Master, which is the great commandment in the law?”
Luke
7:30 “But
the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the counsel of God
against themselves, being not baptized of him.”
Matthew
10:25 “And, behold, a
certain lawyer
stood up, and tempted him,
saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?”
Luke
11:45-47 “Then answered one of the lawyers,
and said unto him, Master, thus saying thou reproachest us also. And
he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye
lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye
yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.
Woe unto you! for ye build the sepulchres of
the prophets, and your fathers killed them.”
Luke
11:52 “Woe unto you, lawyers! for
ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were
entering in ye hindered.
The Pharisees were
always looking for a way to find fault with Jesus or tempt Him in
some way. They sought to trip Him up so that they could accuse Him
and put Him to death, as He was a thorn in their side with His
flaunting of their traditions and showing the people that they were
not the righteous leaders they claimed to be. It undermined their
authority.
Mathew
9:10-11 “And it came to pass, as Jesus sat at meat in the
house, behold, many publicans and sinners came and sat down with him
and his disciples. And when the Pharisees saw
it, they said unto his disciples, Why eateth your Master
with publicans and sinners?”
Mark
2:16 “And when
the scribes and Pharisees saw
him eat with publicans and sinners, they said unto his disciples, How
is it that he eateth and drinketh with publicans and sinners?”
Luke
5:30 “But their
scribes and Pharisees murmured
against his disciples, saying, Why do ye eat and
drink with publicans and sinners?”
Luke
15:2 “And the
Pharisees and scribes murmured,
saying, This man receiveth sinners, and eateth with
them.”
Matthew 11:19 “The Son of man came
eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous,
and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners.”
Luke 7:34 “The Son of man is come
eating and drinking; and ye say, Behold a gluttonous man,
and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners!”
Matthew
9:34 “But the
Pharisees said, He
casteth out devils
through the prince of the devils.”
Matthew
12:24 “But when the Pharisees heard
it, they said, This fellow doth not cast out devils,
but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils.”
Matthew 12:2 “But
when the Pharisees saw it,
they said unto him, Behold, thy disciples do that which is
not lawful to do upon
the sabbath day.”
Mark
2:24 “And
the Pharisees said unto him, Behold, why do they
on the sabbath day that which is not lawful?”
Luke
6:2 “And certain of the Pharisees said
unto them, Why do ye that which is not lawful to
do on the sabbath days?”
Matthew
12:10 “And,
behold, there was a man which had his hand withered. And they
asked him, saying, Is
it lawful to heal on the
sabbath days? that they might accuse him.”
Mark
3:2 “And they
watched him, whether he
would heal him on the sabbath day; that they might
accuse him.”
Luke
6:7 “And
the scribes and Pharisees
watched him, whether he would heal on the sabbath day; that they
might find an accusation against him.”
John 9:16a “Therefore said some of the Pharisees,
This man is not of God, because he keepeth
not the sabbath day.”
Matthew
12:14 “Then the
Pharisees went out, and
held a council against him, how they might destroy
him.”
Mark
3:6 “And the
Pharisees went forth,
and straightway took counsel with the Herodians against him, how
they might destroy him.”
Matthew
19:3 “The Pharisees also came unto
him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is
it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?”
Mark 10:2 “And the
Pharisees came to him, and asked him, Is it
lawful for a man to put away his wife? tempting
him.”
Luke 7:30 “But the
Pharisees and lawyers rejected the counsel of God against
themselves, being not baptized of him.”
Luke
13:14 “And
the ruler of the synagogue answered with
indignation, because that Jesus had healed on the sabbath day,
and said unto the people, There are six days in which men ought to
work: in them therefore come and be healed, and not on the
sabbath day. ”
Matthew
21:45-46 “And when the chief priests and
Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived
that he spake of them. But when they sought to
lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they
took him for a prophet.”
Matthew
22:15 “Then went
the Pharisees, and took
counsel how they might entangle him
in his talk.”
Mark 12:13 “And they send unto him
certain of the Pharisees and of the Herodians,
to catch him in his words.”
Luke 11:53-54 “And as he said
these things unto them, the scribes and the Pharisees
began to urge him vehemently, and to provoke him
to speak of many things: Laying wait for him, and seeking
to catch something out
of his mouth, that they might accuse him.”
Matthew 22:34-35 “But when the
Pharisees had heard that he had put the
Sadducees to silence, they were gathered together. Then
one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a
question, tempting him,”
Matthew
16:1-3a “The Pharisees also with the Sadducees
came, and tempting desired him that
he would shew them a sign
from heaven. He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye
say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red. And in the morning,
It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowring.”
Mark
8:11-12 “And the Pharisees came
forth, and began to question with him, seeking of him a
sign from heaven, tempting him.
And he sighed deeply in his spirit, and saith, Why doth this
generation seek after a sign? verily I say unto you, There shall no
sign be given unto this generation.”
Luke
5:21 “And the scribes and the Pharisees began
to reason, saying, Who is this which speaketh blasphemies?
Who can forgive sins, but God alone?”
Luke
16:14 “And the
Pharisees also, who were covetous,
heard all these things: and they derided him.”
John
7:32 “The
Pharisees heard that the people murmured such things
concerning him; and the Pharisees and the chief priests
sent officers to take him.”
John
8:3-6a “And the scribes and Pharisees
brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her
in the midst, They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in
adultery, in the very act. Now Moses in the law commanded us, that
such should be stoned: but what sayest thou? This they said,
tempting him, that they might have to accuse him.”
John
8:13 “The Pharisees therefore said
unto him, Thou bearest record of thyself; thy record is not
true.”
John
11:47, 53 “Then gathered the chief priests and
the Pharisees a council, and said, What do we? for this
man doeth many miracles..... Then from that day forth they
took counsel together for to put him to death.”
John
11:57 “Now both the chief priests and the
Pharisees had given a commandment, that, if any man knew
where he were, he should shew it, that they might take
him.”
Matthew
20:18 “Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man
shall be betrayed unto the chief priests and unto the scribes,
and they shall condemn him to death,”
Matthew
26:65-67 “Then the high priest rent his clothes,
saying, He hath spoken blasphemy; what further need have we of
witnesses? behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy. What think
ye? They answered and said, He is guilty of death. Then did
they spit in his face, and buffeted him; and others smote
him with the palms of their hands,”
The Pharisees
wielded a lot of power over the people, and disagreeing with them
meant making yourself a target and outcast. Because of this many
people, including some of the chief rulers and Pharisees who
believed, were afraid to confess Jesus.
John
12:42-43 “Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many
believed on him; but because of the Pharisees they did not
confess him, lest they should be put out of the synagogue:
For they loved the praise of men more than the praise of
God.”
John 7:47-49 “Then answered them
the Pharisees, Are ye also deceived? Have
any of the rulers or of the Pharisees believed
on him? But this people who knoweth not the law
are cursed.”
Jesus warned His
disciples about the Pharisees and their traditions and teachings.
Matthew
16:6, 11-12 “Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and
beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the
Sadducees.,,,,How is it that ye do not understand that I
spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware
of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? Then
understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of
bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the
Sadducees.”
Mark
8:15 “And he charged them, saying, Take heed,
beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven
of Herod.”
Luke
12:1 “In the mean time, when there were gathered together
an innumerable multitude of people, insomuch that they trode one upon
another, he began to say unto his disciples first of all, Beware
ye of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.”
Matthew
23:2-7 “Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees
sit in Moses' seat: All therefore whatsoever they bid you
observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their
works: for they say, and do not. For they bind
heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's
shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their
fingers. But all their works they do for to be
seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and
enlarge the borders of their garments, And love the uppermost rooms
at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues, And greetings in
the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.”
Luke
18:11-14 “The Pharisee stood and
prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not
as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or
even as this publican. I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of
all that I possess. And the publican, standing afar off, would not
lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast,
saying, God be merciful to me a sinner. I tell you, this man went
down to his house justified rather than the other: for
every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he
that humbleth himself shall be exalted.”
As can be seen from
the many passages above, Jesus had absolutely no use for the
traditions of men and those who upheld them as being higher than
God's laws, commandments, or Word. This should be a warning to us,
but it seems that many have not learned the lesson. Today a great
number of churches and denominations teach their traditions, some of
which are actually transgressions against God, in place of God's
Word, yet do not see the parallel between themselves and the
Pharisees. They mock the Pharisees as being blind and full of sin,
yet are as blind and as full of sin themselves, putting the
traditions of men before the Word of God. Just as the Pharisees
measured a man's spiritual life as a Jew by how he kept their
traditions, far too many churches, pastors, and just regular
Christians measure a person's relationship with God through Jesus
Christ by how well they observe the traditions of the church, even
when the tradition might be a transgression of God's Word. Or they do
the reverse and take freedoms that God has given as a blessing and
turned them into sins. They call evil, good and good, evil just as
the world is doing, yet are completely oblivious to it.
Recently I came
across a saying which I cannot remember the quote exactly, or who
said it, so I will paraphrase what I remember and add to it what I
feel is needed to complete the thought.
When you find that your favorite and
strongly held views clash with the Word of God, do not start debating
it. If you do, a sense of self-righteousness will emerge and pride
and hypocrisy may be the end result, rather than a learning of the
truth.
Over the years I have attended a
variety of different types of churches, whether as a visitor or
congregant. The one thing that seems common to all of them is that
each has their own traditions. Whether it is the liturgical church
with all of the pomp and ceremony that goes with the ecclesiastical
times of the year, a non-liturgical church which has no formal order
to the worship service at
all, or anything in between, they all still have their traditions or
things which they feel are a necessary part of being a Christian and
without those things, you either aren't a good Christian or aren't a
Christian at all.
I recall, after moving to our present
home, something that I saw when searching for a church to attend. I
walked into the foyer of a local church and a huge sign over the door
into the sanctuary said, “Visitors welcome, members expected.”
And indeed they were. Members expected, that is. They had Sunday
morning worship service and Sunday school, youth group, and Sunday
evening services on Sunday, mid-week prayer service on Wednesday,
revival services yearly, choir rehearsals weekly, meetings of all
sorts, conferences, retreats, etc., etc., etc. The church was a
constant flurry of activity, as was the day of worship. No rest for
the weary. And the members were expected to attend all services or
meetings which were universal, as well as those which were specific
to them. In fact, church took up their whole life. Church was and is
their spiritual life, their social life, their family life (or in
some cases replacement for family), their financial dictator, their
babysitter, their substitute for their parental duties toward their
children's spiritual education, their substitute for personal
evangelism, and in whole, their entire life. This particular church
also had an academy, so the school sports meant that members should,
as much as possible (to support the school) show up for those games,
so it was their recreational life as well, not only with the school
games, but with inter-mural church games. It also provided their
entertainment in the form of school concerts and programs. It took a
grave (pardon the pun) excuse, for instance death, to have your
absence overlooked and not have it brought to your attention as a
lapse. But I also noticed that most of the members were content to
have their entire lives be controlled by and revolve solely around
the church. It provided a safe haven for them to not have to extend
themselves to reach out to the world. They barely interacted with the
community at all. It was as if they were a closed and gated
community. Visitors were really only welcome if they were ready to
embrace the church and let it control every aspect of their lives.
There were other understood requirements as well as the attendance
requirements. No socializing outside of the ranks with the heathen,
no attending non-approved colleges, and absolutely no participating
in unapproved activities. Things such as no alcohol, no dancing, and
other such rules were unwritten, but known to be the standard by
which a person behaved or they were outright said to not be Christian
and became outcasts of the membership. It did not take me more than
one visit to decide I was not going to attend that church as a
congregant.
I have heard from the members of this
type of church, that the reason for these extra man-made rules is not
only to prevent people from sinning, but that they believe the
forbidden things are actually sin (which they aren't). They are under
the impression that to do these things, which are not forbidden by
God (such as have a glass of wine with dinner, go ballroom dancing,
or women wearing slacks for example) will without question lead to
abuse of the privilege, and therefore sin (such as drunkenness or
lasciviousness), as of course people cannot be trusted to use their
own judgment on the matter or have self-control. So the freedom was
removed and rules were created and enforced to make sure that people
did not ever get close to the sin about which God did warn us. This
did not occur with this generation, this occurred many years ago and
has been handed down as the doctrinal truth or position of this
church denomination. Is this not exactly the reason the Pharisees of
Jesus' day gave for their traditions? They added numerous and onerous
rules on top of God's rules making people's lives miserable, and
taught them generation after generation. And if people did not keep
the rules, they were not in good standing with the clergy or
considered a good Jew. It didn't matter that these Pharisees were, as
Christ put it, white-washed sepulchers themselves, and doing sinful
things behind closed doors. They lorded it over the populous and held
themselves up as righteous (self-righteous) examples. So too do the
churches of today.
It is not just the type of church I
described above that has this problem. As odd as it sounds, that
church says that salvation is by faith through grace with no works
required, yet they have all these works and rules that they insist
upon. There are other denominations which do not preach born again
salvation, they preach works, and so people's lives are tied up with
attending services, observing all the ceremonies of induction into
the mysteries of God, doing the works the church offers or approves,
praying the prayers that they are taught to pray for penance, making
sure they give the required amount of money, and etc. etc. etc. It
seems that at either end of the spectrum, as well as in between, the
traditions of the church tend to be the most important thing.
Reading, studying, knowing, and obedience to God's WORD seems
to be, if not irrelevant, at least not all that important.
What
is also of interest is that while the churches teach that if you do
not adhere to their traditions, you will not only not be
a good Christian, but you will be a bad witness, it is not the
unbelievers outside of the church who look upon you as being a bad
Christian or witness. It is the people within the church that judge
you so harshly. I have found that by following God's rules alone,
that when I witness I have more respect from people for not being a
hypocrite, by not having added a bunch of rules of my own. They are
presented with a God who is not the hyper straight-laced and joy
depriving God that He is presented as being. They learn that He wants
self-control and obedience, but that His yoke is easy, not burdensome
when it is understood correctly. I never compromise God's Word by
saying that a sin is not a sin, but I show why the sin is detrimental
to their lives and why God forbids it. It is a much harder thing for
a person to defend their traditions through Scripture, (since they
are not defensible) and so that leaves a bad witness behind as them
being a self-righteous hypocrite, for nobody is sin free, and people
watch you to see what your life presents. If you have sin in your
life, but hold yourself up as morally superior to God, you will not
make a great impression. Self-righteousness is not something that
impresses unbelievers.
God
wants love, mercy, and obedience. While that may sometimes include
taking a Christian to task for a bona fide sin that is taught in
Scripture, it does not mean that we have the right to judge a
person's relationship with Christ by our own traditions and
viewpoints. God's Word is clear about sin and how to deal with it in
the body. Beyond that, we should not judge others freedom in Christ,
nor should we expect them to live up to our own man-made rules. Nor
should we make our churches into social clubs and gated communities.
We are to go out in the world and spread the gospel. That means we
have to interact socially with unbelievers, as Christ did. We should
not partake of their sins (and there is a distinct difference between
sin and freedom in Christ) any more than He did, but we should be
befriending them, so that they get to know our relationship with
Christ, so that we can lead them to Him. We should not be accusing
the brethren who are doing this of not being Christians, because they
don't adhere to our traditions.
As an
example of this, I know a pastor who decided to hold a Bible study at
a VFW. The church had strict rules against alcohol, and this VFW had
a bar (of sorts). Well, the pastor came under condemnation for being
in the building. Seriously
people? You condemned a pastor for trying to bring the gospel to our
veterans just because he was in a building that housed some alcohol?
It wasn't like he was serving it nor was it even available at that
time of day. (Not that serving alcohol is a sin anyhow. Only
drunkenness and alcoholism are the sins that would apply here and
they didn't in this case.) It was a ridiculous accusation against him
and it wasn't long before he gave up the Bible study. I don't know if
that was because of the controversy and condemnation or the lack of
interest, but no matter, it was wrong to condemn him bringing the
gospel to the world. This is what bad traditions do. They get in the
way of salvation.
Now that bad
traditions have been discussed, it is important to recognize that
there are God's traditions and rules, and they must be kept. We have
only two ordinances or traditions. Baptism and the Lord's Supper. We
should be observing those traditions, because God has told us to.
We
also have rules for obedience. We should give of our money to the
Lord (although each person is to determine in their heart what to
give) because we are told to by God. We should gather with other
believers for fellowship and worship, especially as the Day of the
Lord approaches, but
nowhere did God specify that it had to be in a church, or on a Sunday
(I will get to this problem in a minute), or that it had to have a
certain kind of order of service, or had to be multiple times a week.
He just said to gather with other like-minded (that's a hard thing to
find) believers to give us fellowship, corporate worship of Him,
growth in knowledge as we study, and to support and help one another.
We are to pray, and when two or more are gathered in His name, He is
there too, but nowhere does it say that we have to attend the weekly
prayer service on a particular night of the week. We should pray
without ceasing. What pastors should be teaching on prayer is not the
traditions of attendance, but the need to have a relationship with
God where praying is akin to breathing. You do it automatically all
the time without even thinking about it. It should be that effortless
and continual. Prayer times with others is a bonus, but not a weekly
mandatory requirement. The more you learn to make it a part of your
life like breathing, the more inclined you would be to gather with
others to pray. And you would not have to beat people over the head
to put in an appearance for the sake of appearances. That is not
being there because of a heart desire, it is merely fulfilling an
obligation.
We
have many other things we should be doing – witnessing, using our
talents, working on bearing the fruits of the spirit, confessing our
sins, and other things which God has told us to do. We are to be
obeying the Ten Commandments. Now as mentioned above, I want to
address one of those things. Most if not all Christians will agree
that nine of those ten are things we absolutely should or should not
be doing. We should have no other gods before Him, we should not take
His name in vain, we should not make graven images, we should not
kill, or commit adultery, or steal, or bear false witness or covet.
We should honor our parents, and lastly the one commandment that
tradition has taught us to sin against for practically two millennia,
we are to keep the Sabbath holy. Man's tradition, NOT
God's Word has said that we are to forsake the commandment of God
(which is an eternal covenantal sign as well as a commandment) and
adhere to man's tradition instead. If you do not believe this, then
read my article on this here
https://bibleconundrumsandcontroversy.blogspot.com/2011/02/sabbath-or-sunday.html.
Man took a commandment of God, just as the Pharisees did, and
rejected it and transgressed it replacing it with their own tradition
and then made it into a doctrine.
The argument is made that people cannot be trusted to not sin,
therefore rules must be made to create a hedge for people. This takes
away the instruction that God gave us to learn to have self-control.
How can a person learn self-control if they are never challenged to
have to exercise it. These traditions keep people from growing. Then
instead of preaching and teaching self-control, to work at a
relationship with God that is so part of one that one doesn't know a
moment without His presence, they preach against the objects of
“sin”, such as alcohol, or dancing, or slacks on women, or
buttons, or electricity, and the “sin” of not attending services
or praying the requisite prayers for penance or whatever the
so-called “sin” is. What they need to teach is how to grow in the
Lord and study His Word, not just read it through a hundred times.
Preaching rules only gets outer conformity to traditions. Preaching
how to grow in a relationship with Christ teaches how to not sin
against God's commandments by the heart's choice.
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
Should We Use the Greek Text When Studying the Bible?
In the past two days, I was told by no
less than five different unrelated people that one should not look to
the Greek for help when one is in need of further enlightenment about
a word or phrase that might be ambiguous or need further
clarification. In fact, I was told by several of those people that
God meant for us to rely only on the English version. Further
comments told me that it cannot be trusted, and it cannot be
understood unless you are a scholar who has studied it, therefore you
are better to leave it alone, and other such comments. I have heard
it jokingly said that there are people who say, “The King James
Bible was good enough for Paul, so it's good enough for me.”
Sometimes I think people really are that lacking in knowledge, when I
hear some of the comments they make.
First of all, to say that the Greek
cannot be trusted seems to be a ludicrous statement. The Bible in
English is a translation of the Greek, so if the Greek cannot be
trusted, how can the English? Secondly, one does not have to have a
degree in ancient Greek in order to pick up an interlinear Bible and
a concordance and look up what the word is in Greek (or Hebrew for
that matter) and its definitions. Why should we leave it alone as a
study tool, as if it were a forbidden book, when it is so available
to enhance our studying? Can it be misused by wolves who want to
teach heresy? Of course it can, and so can the English. Most people
are so unfamiliar with their English Bible that they can be fooled
without ever having to go to the Greek to convince them of something,
as they never check what information they are being fed against the
Word of God.
Is it really necessary? Can't one get
the full intent of something from just the context and grammar? Well,
most of the time you probably can, but there are times when you miss
something, if you don't look to the original language. Let me give an
example. Let us look at John 21:15-17 in the English. “So when
they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas,
lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou
knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs. He saith
to him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He
saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith
unto him, Feed my sheep. He saith unto him the third time, Simon,
son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto
him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou
knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto
him, Feed my sheep.”
I have heard
sermons on this passage, with all kinds of speculation as to why
Peter was grieved and why Jesus said it three times. One is that
Jesus knew Peter was going to deny Him three times, so He asked him
if he loved Him three times. Another says that Jesus wanted Peter to
understand the importance of preaching the gospel so He emphasized it
three times by telling him to feed His sheep. I don't know that I
ever heard an explanation for why Peter was grieved, except that
Christ asked him three times. Now let us consider the Greek. We only
need to look at one word, the word “love.” In English we have
only one word for all kinds of love. In the Greek there are at least
four - “Agape” the kind of sacrificial love that God has for us
and we as Christians should have for God and others, “philia”
brotherly love (hence the city of Philadelphia being the the city of
brotherly love), “eros” sexual love, and “storge” the kind of
affection families have for each other. In this case we are going to
focus on the words “agape” and “philia.” When we rewrite
this passage substituting the appropriate Greek word, we find that
the passage reads like this.
“So when they
had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas, agape
thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest
that I philia thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs. He saith to
him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, agape thou me? He
saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I philia thee. He saith
unto him, Feed my sheep. He saith unto him the third time, Simon,
son of Jonas, philia thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto
him the third time, philia thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou
knowest all things; thou knowest that I philia thee. Jesus saith unto
him, Feed my sheep.”
Now let us look at
it the way Christ might have said it in today's English. “Peter, do
you love me? Yes, Lord, you know I love you like a
brother..................No Peter, I mean, do you really LOVE
me, like you'd die for me? Lord, you know that I love you just like
a brother.....................Peter...... so...... you love me like a
brother then.” And Peter was grieved that Jesus accepted and
acknowledged that he loved him like a brother, but not to the point
of sacrificial love. And Peter said, “Lord, you know everything
there is to know, so you know that I love you like a brother.”
It makes much more
sense to understand why Peter was grieved, when you understand that
Christ had changed the word from agape to philia, for it was a
downgrading of the relationship on Peter's side that Christ was
acknowledging. It was a disappointment. You would never get that from
the English. And it does not take a degree in Greek in order to gain
that knowledge. Merely a copy of Strong's Concordance.
What initially
brought on this entire discussion was a disagreement over, of all
things, the word “men.” Now who would think that the word “men”
would need to be defined, but it did. The verse in question said that
“they were redeemed from among men.” Now I had always taken that
in the English to mean that the word “men” meant from among all
of mankind. The other party was of the opinion that the word
literally and specifically meant adult males. So to answer the
disagreement, I went to the Greek word in the concordance and looked
it up. In this particular case, the Greek word was “anthropos.”
Now that word should be recognizable as the root word of our word
“anthropology.” I am very familiar with the word, because my one
son is an anthropologist. Anthropology is the study of humans, as in
mankind. And the Greek definition of the word was “human beings,”
not specifically adult males. So going to the Greek proved that I had
indeed interpreted the phrase correctly that they were redeemed from
among mankind or human beings. Unfortunately this person was one who
fell into the category of people I mentioned at the start. The Greek
was not trusted, therefore my going to the Greek did nothing to end
the debate.
One of the
arguments given to me by one of the aforementioned group of five, was
that the original manuscripts were inspired by God and without
error, but the copies were merely that, copies that were suspect as
to accuracy, but God has told us that He would preserve His Word (the
intent more or less) so the KJV was the Bible we are to use and God
will tell us everything we need to know through that, as since we
don't have the original manuscripts, this is as good as you can get.
I would take issue with that. Jesus said that not one jot or tittle
would pass from the law until all was fulfilled. Now the law is the
Masoretic Hebrew text which is far, far older than the Greek New
Testament. Yet here is Christ telling us that a copy (as they
probably did not have the original either) of the Old Testament is
still perfectly preserved word for word, even to the jot and tittles
on the words (Jots and tittles are the equivalent of the dots over
the “I's” and crosses on the “T's”.) and it would continue to
be until all is fulfilled. If God could preserve that, and
continues to, why could He not preserve the Greek New Testament as
well even in its copies. In this case, the copies that I would say
are the accurately preserved ones are the copies of the Received
Text, which was circulated around the area of Antioch and Byzantine.
They are very different from the Alexandrian texts, which were found
in Egypt. For more on this and why the difference, read my article on
the KJV Bible.
https://bibleconundrumsandcontroversy.blogspot.com/2011/01/king-james-version-only-controversy.html
The copiers of the
original manuscripts were very exact in how they copied it. They
checked in every way possible to make sure that there were no
mistakes. And the large number of extant manuscripts that we have of
the Received Text show extremely little differences, meaning that
they kept any mistakes to a bare minimum. Any mistakes have been
easily caught by seeing upon what the greater number of manuscripts
agree, thereby giving us a very accurate Greek version of the New
Testament. The same can be said of the Masoretic Hebrew texts as
well. So while we may not have the actual originals, just as we may
not have the originals today of some things, but copies made from a
computer or copier machine, the content is just as accurate as the
original. Therefore it can be trusted. And as pointed out at the
beginning, if you cannot trust the Greek, how can you trust a
translation of it, when no translation is perfectly word for word,
although the KJV does that as much as a translation possibly can.
There is a slight loss of information though, to a certain extent, as
pointed out in the passage of John that I quoted above, as English
does not have as precise a language as Greek had. To be able to check
into the Greek can only bring greater understanding, unless it is
your deliberate intent to want to make a passage say something
other than it intends, because you want to try to push a theory or
private interpretation which is not actually taught there. And there
are people who will do this. But they do that with the English as
well. It requires being studious, discerning, and a Berean, and
checking what people teach against the Scriptures to catch things
like that. And for the record, yes, I encourage people to check
anything that I write against the Word of God. I want people in their
Bibles learning what it says, and I am not afraid of being
challenged, as so many who want to deceive are. If everybody were in
their Bibles as they should be, I could quit writing.
So, in conclusion, while true understanding does come from the Holy Spirit teaching
you, it makes His job easier if you use all the tools at your
disposal. If you want to get a little deeper into your study of the Scriptures,
by all means, get yourself a KJV Bible, Greek interlinear Bible
using the Received Text, a Hebrew text (Masoretic) , and a good
concordance, along with a good Bible dictionary, lexicon, maps, and
etc. Don't listen to those scholars who say that you can't possibly understand how to use them. They just don't want you being able to study the Bible on your own without their input. You might find out that they aren't always right, and that might put them out of a job.
Saturday, September 2, 2017
Can a Christian Have a Tattoo or Body Piercing? What Does God Say?
Of late tattoos seem to be in your face
everywhere you turn. It isn't just the usual and expected people that
have them, (military, gang members, etc.) but now, because it is a
fashion trend, all manner of people from all walks of life are
getting them, including Christians. Many men and women are getting
entire legs and arms tattooed with tattoo sleeves, as they are
called. Some of these tattoos seem innocuous, but some of them seem
very demonic in nature. Christians who are getting them seem to be
giving the excuse that they are honoring the Lord or somebody
important in their lives, so therefore it is okay with God. In fact,
I am seeing over and over, articles on how it is perfectly okay for a
Christian to get tattoos, but is that true? Does God not care, or
does He have an opinion on the matter? From strictly a personal
opinion, God's Word aside, I find all of them unattractive,
regardless. That's just my personal opinion. I also see the body
piercings that way, but I will deal with those later on in this
article. The reason that I do find them unattractive is that it reeks
of pagan ways and customs, and it simply seems very unattractive to
me, the way far too much makeup or jewelry, or especially hideous attire
detracts from a person's attractiveness. It is distracting and the
demonic tattoos especially seem to desecrate the image of God in
which we were created. It just seems wrong by nature. But my personal
taste and opinion are not the ones that matter. It is God's opinion
that does, and so it is God's opinion that we must look to as the
determining factor as to whether or not these things are acceptable
for a Christian to have.
Well, as much as some may not like it,
it seems that God does have an opinion on the matter. Leviticus 19:28
says, “Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the
dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.” We are
told that God does not want us marking up our body by making cuttings
(which people did for mourning), carving things into it (which some
tribal cultures do to mark their bodies for various reasons) or to
get tattoos (marks). And it not just that we should not do it to honor the
dead. He apparently does not approve for any reason. “Ah,” but
the opposition says, “that is the Old Testament, and those laws
were done away with.” Were they? Were they really? All of them?
Many of them were reiterated in the New Testament. The Ten
Commandments still stand, as do all the moral laws. A discussion of
that issue can be found in another of my articles, but suffice it to
say, if God gives us some indication in the New Testament that an Old
Testament mandate still stands, we should pay attention.
In 1 Cor. 6:19-20 we read, “What?
know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is
in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? For ye are
bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your
spirit, which are God's.” We are to glorify God in our body.
But the opposition says, “But that is what we are doing. We are
glorifying God by our tattoos.” But that begs the question, are you
glorifying God when you do what He has already made clear that He does
not approve? How exactly can you glorify God by disobeying Him?
Clearly He does not like tattoos, and one of the reasons is that it
imitates the pagan nations. Leviticus 20:23 “And ye shall not
walk in the manners of the nation, which I cast out before you: for
they committed all these things, and therefore I abhorred them.”
God has said that we are not to emulate the customs nor behave as
the pagan or unsaved world does, and the unsaved world loves their
tattoos. So do we have permission to do it to honor God or some
other person in our lives? No, we don't. 1 Corinthians 10:3 says,
“Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all
to the glory of God.” If God does not like tattoos, if for Him
they represent your alignment and compromise with the world, can you
really say that you are doing it for the glory of God? No, you
can't. You are doing it for yourself.
The truth is that most people do it, as
it brings attention to themselves, or they believe it makes them cool
and trendy with the world. Some even have the erroneous idea that it
makes them more attractive. In other words, they want it because
their flesh lusts after it. For the unsaved, that might be a reason
that can work for them, for they have no concern with glorifying God
and they live for the flesh, but Christians are supposed to live for
God and deny the flesh. To desire a tattoo for vanity's sake is to
live for the flesh. Galatians 5:17 “For the flesh lusteth
against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are
contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that
ye would.” If you feed the flesh, you deny the spirit. They
are in opposition to each other. How can feeding the flesh glorify
and honor God? It can't.
Are there any other concerns that
should make a Christian stop and really consider taking this very
permanent step of getting a tattoo? Yes, a very dangerous one that
virtually no Christian seems to understand or know about. Tattoos
were used by pagans for a very specific reason and purpose. One that should
frighten Christians, and it is the real reason why God forbad them.
Tattoos were and are used by pagans to bond themselves to a demon
overlord or spirit guide, as we call them today. They would take the
sign or name of the demon on their body by tattoo, which was a
lifetime commitment to this demon, and in return the demon bonded
itself to them, controlling or helping them as it desired. Now,
Christian reader, if you have a tattoo, think about that for a
minute. Have you bonded yourself to a spiritual entity without your
knowledge? Have you give a demon oversight over some parts of your
life without realizing it? You may answer, “I tattooed a Scripture
verse on myself so how could it be demonic?” It is there by
disobedience, and what verse did you choose? Is it one you are
twisting for your own benefit? I know someone who has “Judge not
lest ye be judged” on her neck. But she has no idea what the verse
truly means and has twisted it to mean that nobody should judge HER
for her sins, while she hatefully berates anybody else who takes a
stand on God's Word against sin, as being hateful and bigoted. Irony
at its best.That is how Satan uses Scripture.
Have you had guilt over getting a
tattoo? The Holy Spirit is telling you to repent. Have you had
problems that you can't explain since getting it? Maybe you got a
demon along with it. Or maybe God is trying to make you aware that
you disobeyed and need to repent. So what do you do, since tattoos
are permanent? (short of very expensive laser removal, which can leave scars) You do the only thing you can do at this point. You
repent, and you renounce the demon that came with your tattoo. You
cast them away in the name of Jesus. And then you tell every
Christian you know to not get one, because of this danger it poses.
You become a poster boy (or girl) against this sin.We all have regrets for sins we have committed, and some of them come with lifelong consequences. This is one of those sins.
Why should it be so important to warn others? Well,
the answer to that comes, in not just avoiding demon overlords, but
in a verse in Revelation. Chapter 13:16-17 “And he causeth all,
both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark
in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy
or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the
number of his name.” While most of the Christian world has come
to the hypothesis that the mark is a chip under the skin, and I won't say it isn't possible, there is a
slight problem with that and Scripture. First of all, the word “mark” is in
Greek “charagma.” This word means an etching or scratching in the
skin as a badge of servitude. Clearly this is speaking of a tattoo,
not a chip under the skin. The argument is that John didn't know what
a chip was, so how could he designate it as such. The only word he
could use was “mark.” While that could be true, the next problem
is that a chip comes in one form. It would contain all the computer
knowledge needed to transact business, not merely be a mark, a name, or a
number. This mark comes in three forms. One is just a mark, possibly
a logo or sign representing the beast, the second form is his name,
and the third is the number of his name. There are three “tattoos”
from which to choose, if we read it just as written. What may transpire is that to get a chip,
whether implanted or in a smart card, so that one can transact
business, one must take the mark or tattoo to bond themselves in
servitude to the beast first.
For those who have read my endtimes
blog, you will know that I believe Hitler was the last incarnation of
the beast. And what did he do? He tattooed all the Jews with a
number. To this day, we know what and for whom that number stood and
represented – Hitler - the seventh head of the beast of Revelation. And those who took it could not buy or sell.
They were rounded up and put to death. History has a way of repeating itself, but this time it is sort of in reverse. Taking the mark saves your life and allows you to buy and sell. However, also this
time taking the mark is an eternal death sentence, not an immediate physical one (I won't speak to the eternal state of the Jews who died), so I
believe people will have a choice, die or take it. Revelation 13:15
“And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that
the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as
would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.” Those
who refuse to take the mark of servitude, bonding themselves
permanently (eternally) to the beast, will be killed. By God's grace
and forgiveness, you may be able to unbond yourself from any demon
you might have acquired unintentionally through taking a tattoo now,
but you will not then.
Leaving aside the spiritual
significance of doing this, let us take a look at the health issues
involved. Getting a tattoo can be dangerous to your physical health.
Below is a list of health issues that
can occur when getting a tattoo.
- Allergic reactions – tattoo dyes can cause allergic reactions even years after getting the tattoo. The reactions are due to the dyes used. Some red inks used for tattoos contain mercury, while other reds may contain different heavy metals like cadmium or iron oxide. These metals have been known to cause allergic reactions as well as eczema and scarring, and can cause sensitivity to mercury from other sources like dental fillings or consuming some fish. While red causes the most problems, most other colors are also derived from heavy metals including lead, antimony, beryllium, chromium, cobalt nickel and arsenic. These metals can cause further damage when one gets an MRI. The metals may cause swelling and burning in the tattooed area during an MRI exam. The pigments can also interfere with the quality of the image.
- Skin infections – skin infections, if bad enough, can result in serious procedures, like removing the area of the tattooed skin to stop the spread of the infection, which will result in a deformity where the skin has been removed. Worse, one can get a staphylococcus infection which could lead to death. There has been at least one person who died from an infection caught while going swimming, after having a tattoo instead of waiting for it to heal.
- Blood-borne diseases can be caused by contaminated needles. The diseases that one might contract are Hepatitis B or C, HIV, tetanus, syphilis, mycobacterium, tuberculosis, malaria, leprosy, and some of these can lead to liver cancer.
- Other skin problems are bumps called granulomas which form around the tattoo ink, or keloids, which are raised areas caused by an overgrowth of scar tissue.
More current literature and studies have shown that more serious tattoo-induced skin disorders are showing up such as sarcoidosis, lichen planis, and a disease that resembles lupus. These are more long-lasting diseases and leave permanent scarring. Of interest is that laser tattoo removal services are rapidly growing across the nation, becoming a multi-million dollar business with great potential growth. This seems to speak to the regrets of people's decisions to get these tattoos.
As for body piercing, the Bible talks a little about piercing. Exodus 21:5-6 “And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free: Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him for ever.” Having one's ear (one only) pierced (assuming that to keep it open one had a ring put in it), was a way to signify that a servant did not want his freedom, but wanted to continue to serve his master for life. Other than that, there are many references to the women wearing earrings, which also would most likely have been via pierced ears. The Bible seems to be fine with having one's ears pierced. There is one verse that mentions nose jewels, but it is in chastisement for the way the woman are presenting themselves and behaving, which does not leave the impression that God is approving this particular decoration. So basically the only piercings mentioned are for women's ears for earrings, and a single earring to designate a lifelong servitude.
As for piercing the other parts of the body, we have to refer back to the verses used for tattooing. The pagans pierced various parts of their bodies, and we are told that we are not to emulate the pagans, so it would seem that doing this is not going to please God.
As for the health issues, these can be very bad.
- Infection - Piercing the skin can cause bleeding and open
wounds which can get infected. Infections at the pierced site can
cause permanent deformity, scarring, severe illness, and even death
if the infection is a staph infection. There are serious infection
concerns related to piercing some parts of the body (e.g., ear
cartilage, tongue, eyebrows, nipples, navel, genitals). There is an
increased possibility of infection when cartilage is pierced because
the blood supply is less. While ear lobes are fine, further up the
ear there is cartilage which can cause a problem. Noses are also
cartilage. A bacterial infection can develop into an abscess. This
pus-filled mass can develop around the piercing. This is a serious
side effect. If left untreated, there’s the risk for sepsis or
blood poisoning. Sepsis is a life-threatening response to an
infection that can result in organ failure and death. Symptoms of
blood poisoning include a high fever, chills, a fast heartbeat, and
rapid breathing. Infections are more common with mouth and nose
piercings because these areas contain more bacteria.
- Blood-borne diseases – the lack of cleanliness of the
equipment can lead to Hepatitis B and C, HIV, tetanus, and
tuberculosis.
- Mouth piercings can be very dangerous. The mouth is a home to
a huge amount of breeding bacteria and an ideal place for an
infection to develop. If not treated promptly, an infection here can
become life-threatening. An oral (mouth) piercing is a small hole
in your tongue, lip, cheek, or uvula (the tiny tissue at the back of
your throat). Your mouth is filled with bacteria that can lead to
infection and swelling. A swollen tongue can block your air
pathways, making it hard for you to breathe. In some people with
heart disease, bacteria can lead to a condition that can damage your
heart valves.
- Tongue piercings also can put you at risk for bleeding and
blood loss. You have a lot of blood vessels in the area. You may
also have trouble speaking, chewing, swallowing and may end up
drooling from increased saliva production.
- The jewelry can cause issues as well. It can break off in
your mouth and be swallowed or make you choke. You can chip,
scratch, or crack your teeth or make your teeth sensitive from it
while you eat, sleep, talk, or chew on it. If the break goes deep
into your tooth, you can lose it or need a root canal to fix it. It
can make it hard for the dentist to take X-rays of your teeth. It
can also damage your fillings and gums, leading to gum disease. And
finally it may lead to an allergic reaction to the metal in the
jewelry.
- Nerve damage is possible. After a piercing, you may experience a numb tongue that is caused by nerve damage that is usually temporary, but can sometimes be permanent. The injured nerve may affect your sense of taste, or how you move your mouth.
- Nipple piercings have been associated with partial removal of the breast due to infection. It can also scar the breast tissue limiting the ability to breast-feed later on.
- A genital piercing can cause painful sex and urination. The
risk of complications is higher if you have other medical conditions
like: diabetes, allergies, (especially if you’ve ever had a
reaction that caused breaking out in red bumps, swelling of the
throat, or difficulty breathing), skin disorders (such as eczema or
psoriasis), and a weak immune system. Jewelry in the genital area
may cause injury to you or your sex partner. It also can cause
condom breakage, increasing the risk of pregnancy and exposure to
sexually transmitted diseases. Piercings in the penis can decrease a
man's ability to get or maintain an erection.
- The skin can be split or torn which would cause scarring, not
to mention being painful and can lead to a bad infection.
- Jewelry in the navel can get caught on clothing and linens.
This constant irritation can delay healing. Navel piercings can take
up to a year to heal completely.
- Piercing can easily cause keloids, greatly enlarged scars
that project above the surface of the skin.
So as it can be seen, God has a good reason for not wanting us to tattoo ourselves, nor should we pierce ourselves all over our body, if only for health reasons. Tattoos, though, carry an added spiritual dimension that is very concerning. As a Christian, one should want to live according to God's Word. If one already has a tattoo, then repentance and making sure you do not have a demon is the thing to do. Then as Christ said, “Go and sin no more.” And pass on the lesson learned to others who are considering sinning against God.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)